Independent PhD Research Proposal: Art as Cognitive Reconstruction

​

Introduction

Personal Context and Project Foundation

​

Much of human life is shaped by routines and patterns—are set before us, some created unconsciously, and others established knowingly. Reflecting on the events and experiences throughout my own life, I have made a conscious decision to understand them as they truly are, examining how these moments have influenced and evolved my personal journey. This perspective forms the basis of my art project, Art as Cognitive Reconstruction: A Study in Neuroplasticity and Narrative Resilience, which emerges from both personal experience and decades spent engaged in creative pursuits.

​

Research Focus: Branding, Gatekeeping, and Audience Dynamics in Artistic Practice

​

This research proposal explores the intersection of art, neuroplasticity, and narrative resilience by examining how branding and audience perception affect artistic experience and engagement. Central to the inquiry is the phenomenon of "silence “the lack of acknowledgment or engagement that artists may encounter. Rather than interpreting this silence as mere failure, the research frames it as an entry point for analyzing the psychological and sociological mechanisms at play, particularly cognitive resistance and gatekeeping in any type of cultural environments.

​

Silence as Branding Insight

​

The perceived silence or absence of response to an artwork or brand is not simply an indicator of defeat. Instead, it provides a unique opportunity to investigate how branding functions and how audiences interact with new or unconventional works. This perspective highlights the barriers posed by cognitive resistance—where audiences may shy away from unfamiliar ideas—and by gatekeeping, which restricts access and validation within all type of cultural spaces.

​

Cultural Gatekeeping Dynamics

Within artistic communities, established groups in many cultures often act or function as arbiters of taste, determining what is recognized as valuable or "cool." These gatekeepers create invisible boundaries that can function like a covert boycott, marginalizing independent or avant-garde expressions to what is deemed not acceptable. Such mechanisms not only limit diversity in many cultures, but also reinforce existing power structures in the art world.

​

Audience Engagement Challenges

The intended audience for this work consists mainly of active learners and insight seekers only—a demographic that is naturally smaller and more selective. This results in longer discovery times and lower initial engagement. Additionally, the complex or dense nature of the content may overwhelm more casual visitors, leading to passive observation rather than active participation. The "Silent Watcher" effect describes those who follow and absorb the work without direct interaction, reflecting the heavy cognitive demands placed on the audience.

​

Creative Autonomy and Free Will

Grounded in a universalist reading of religious texts such as the Torah and other religions, the research frames creative drive as an intrinsic, divinely inspired force that transcends external validation. This approach emphasizes the importance of self-motivated inquiry and the pursuit of authenticity, positioning creative autonomy as inherently resistant to the limitations imposed by many cultural gatekeepers.

​

Understanding the "Silence": Branding, Gatekeeping, and Resistance

The experience of "silence"—being ignored—serves as a catalyst for a deeper investigation into the forces shaping branding and audience acceptance across various cultures. This silence is not simply a lack of sales or recognition; it is a signal that invites analysis of what defines acceptability, whether a brand is newly emerging or well-established. Such moments of being overlooked or feeling as though one is subjected to an implicit boycott are evidence of broader psychological and sociological patterns. These patterns often stem from the audience's cognitive resistance to unfamiliar ideas and the less visible, yet influential, barriers of gatekeeping that operate within a lot of cultural spaces.

​

At the core, silence reflects a dynamic interplay between cognitive resistance to the new and the invisible walls of "Gatekeeping." Cognitive resistance manifests when audiences hesitate or reject novel concepts, while gatekeeping enforces boundaries that determine which voices, brands, or artistic expressions gain visibility and validation. Together, these mechanisms shape the landscape of artistic engagement and influence the trajectory of creative work within any cultural environment.

​

Perceived Silence and the Dynamics of Branding

The intersection of 1980s military history and avant-garde art in my work creates a tension with traditional systems of categorization. This blend of styles does not conform to standard categories typically found in retail stores or simple blogs, making it difficult to neatly classify or market within conventional frameworks. Cultural gatekeeping often operates as a “secret boycott,” where established groups—sometimes referred to as the Old Guard—act as the arbiters of what is considered valid or “cool.” These decision-making entities set the boundaries of acceptance within the artistic community, often excluding expressions that do not align with their values or tastes. Rather than waiting for galleries or publishers to provide validation, the independent artist moves forward on their own terms. This autonomy challenges the established gatekeepers, who attempt to define what art is worthy of attention. The drive for independence can be perceived as a threat to those who judge and assign value within the cultural sphere.

​

The Arc of Engagement Gap and Audience Dynamics

There is a clear gap in audience engagement, often referred to as the Arc of Engagement Gap. Most people in the audience are casual observers or process information mainly through technology, while the work itself is designed with active learners and insight seekers in mind. Because this group is smaller and more selective, it naturally takes longer for the work to be discovered and appreciated by its intended audience. The website, in this context, serves as a mirror that reflects the audience’s reaction—revealing indifference rather than hostility. Hatred implies that the work has captured attention, but indifference signals the “chilling void” experienced when people overlook or ignore what they are not conditioned to notice. This response underscores the real challenge faced by unconventional or complex works in finding genuine engagement.

 

The Branding Lesson: Proof of Concept and Historical Perspective

The most valuable phase in branding is the Proof of Concept. This stage is characterized by a sense of “void,” where successful brands often begin. During this period, the brand is largely ignored until it reaches a Tipping Point. It is at this moment that the insight seekers start to notice the brand and begin sharing its value with the casual audience, facilitating wider recognition and understanding. Many artists, such as Vincent van Gogh and William Blake, spent their entire lives within this “void.” Their lack of recognition was not a reflection of the quality of their work, but rather an indication that their audience had not yet developed the “trained eye” necessary to fully appreciate their art. The process of audience development and recognition is slow, and often the true value of the work is realized only after the artist’s lifetime.

​

User Experience and the Silent Watcher Theory

In the realm of branding psychology, the website is intentionally dense, filled with deep and meaningful content. For the typical modern internet user, whose attention span is only a few seconds, this can result in cognitive overload. The richness and complexity of the material challenge the audience and requires more than a passing glance to be understood.  According to the Silent Watcher theory, for every digital branding effort, one hundred people may view the content, but only one will take action such as liking or commenting. These “lurkers” quietly observe, read, and process the information. Because the content is substantial and serious, they are less likely to engage openly. The refusal to conform to predefined categories or expectations creates friction, highlighting the tension between individual sovereignty and collective conditioning.

​

Gatekeeping, Categorization, and Free Will

Gatekeeping through categorization is a societal mechanism, using labels such as Middle Class or Working Poor, the elite, the one percent, etc. as soft forms of gatekeeping. The purpose of these “boxes” is to categorize people for marketing, predict voting behavior, and define boundaries. The core question becomes whether individuals or people as a whole, or the culture accept these labels or choose to exercise their free will and move beyond them, and liking something because they like it and not what someone else says. The concept of Yesh me-Ayin (Something from Nothing) found in the Torah provides a compelling framework. Most people wait for permission, funding, or validation before creating, but this is ultimately a choice. The drive to create arises from a divine spark and represents proof of self-sovereignty. Building a brand, or pursuing an in-depth inquiry, does not depend on gatekeepers for its existence; it is an act of independence and curiosity.

​

The Universal Lens, Financial Independence, and Brand Archetypes: Notes Expanded

 

The Universal Lens: Comparative Humanity and Cultural Mirrors

When approaching the Torah and other religions from the perspective of a non-Jewish individual, or non- of other religions, the intent is to seek comparative humanity as a whole. This universalist approach involves viewing the world through the lens of single human culture, while using human behavior as the primary framework for understanding. Studying outside one's own race or labels and our cultural context often reveals the common pitfalls that we as humanity mostly all share, such as financing unnecessary things or following the herd mentality.  For example, if I buy a particular brand of car, why should the whole neighborhood follow what I must or might do?  And if I buy or fix up my house a particular pertaining to me and my experiences, should the whole neighborhood or nation do the same? No one knows why I am making the purchase or creating something, and what is the goal in my life or milestone that is or has been reached?  My website acts as a mirror for visitors: when people encounter a depth within themselves that they have not previously explored, their instinctive response is often to look away.

​

Breaking the Financial Box and the Journey to Self-Actualization

Breaking free from the financial box means striving for brand independence and moving beyond the conventional belonging phase of human experience. The focus shifts toward self-actualization, where clarity and personal authenticity take precedence over the approval or presence of a crowd. The concept of a "secret boycott" emerges as society's way of expressing uncertainty or discomfort toward someone who does not seek its permission or validation.

​

Academic Gatekeeping and the Challenge of Nonconformity

Within academic environments, gatekeeping is a significant force. Refusing to be confined within established boxes can be perceived as a threat by those in power, who often gained their positions by adhering to conventional paths. The act of creating from nothingness, rather than simply following instructions, can be unsettling to those who value tradition and conformity.

​

Personal Experience: Challenging Academic Boxes

​

Standing Up to Academic Authority

I experienced firsthand the pressure to conform within academic settings when an English professor returned my paper with a large red “F.” I noticed that other students had received similar marks. Despite my late-night efforts, correct citation of sources, and adherence to writing standards taught in junior high and high school, my work was dismissed. Determined to understand the reasoning, I approached the professor, respectfully stating my concerns with, “With all due respect,” and explained my position. The professor told me to take a seat. Refusing to back down, I asserted myself, causing the podium to fall over during the exchange. The professor then instructed me to meet in the office. At that moment, I was unconcerned about possible suspension because I was confident in my work—I had even consulted another professor, known for their rigor, to review my paper.

​

Lessons in Nonconformity and Initiative

During our office meeting, the professor laughed at my actions and told me that I was the only student across all classes who had challenged them. I was surprised by this response. The professor explained that society generally waits to be told what to do and commended me for taking initiative and refusing to be confined by expectations. Later, in my final office visit, the professor shared that other students had formed groups to challenge classroom norms, eventually taking their concerns to the dean, just as the professor had predicted. As a result of my willingness to question and engage independently, I earned top grades—receiving all “A’s” in both English and Speech classes. Following the professor’s advice, I then met with the career counselor to continue my educational journey.

 

Guidance from the Career Counselor: Fulfilling the Core as a Path to the Keys to the Kingdom

The second pivotal moment in my academic journey came during a meeting with the college career counselor. I was advised to complete the core curriculum before pursuing my individual interests. At first glance, this guidance seemed to direct me into yet another box—a structured path that could potentially limit my options and keep me contained within a predetermined framework. I quickly recognized that this degree program, like others, had the potential to confine me, and I noticed a pattern: other professors also began to guide me toward specific degrees or academic “boxes,” each with its own boundaries and expectations.

However, upon deeper reflection, I realized that the career counselor’s advice was not a means of restriction, but rather an avenue to freedom. By choosing to fulfill the societal contract and complete the core educational requirements, I gained the leverage needed to move beyond the limitations imposed by academic boxes. This strategic compliance allowed me to satisfy institutional expectations, while simultaneously earning the autonomy to chart my own course and explore my true interests without being constrained by externally imposed boundaries. This is truly the gift of the keys to the Kingdom in life.

​

Brand Archetypes: The Outlaw and the Sage

In branding and psychology, the Outcast archetype stands as one of the twelve recognized brand archetypes. While most people often strive to align themselves with the Everyman or Innocent archetypes, my own identification is rooted in the Outlaw (Rebel) and the Sage.

​

The Outlaw archetype is characterized by its power to break out of boxes and challenge established norms. This form of rebellion is not about showing disrespect or disgrace; rather, it is about questioning for the sake of understanding and transformation. In contrast, the Sage archetype is driven by a continuous quest to comprehend the underlying mechanisms and reasons for existence itself. When these two archetypes are combined within a brand, the result is a unique synthesis that is both intellectually profound and fiercely independent. Such a combination is rare, making it difficult for those with a "middle-class" mindset to relate. People who are accustomed to being sold to are often unprepared to be challenged to think.  When challenged to think confusion sets in which can lead to chaos.

​

Conformity vs. Nonconformity in Education and Family

In both educational institutions and family environments, individuals who comply with established norms are often considered easier to handle than those who challenge or resist conformity. This dynamic is particularly evident in schools, where students who perform below expectations but remain within accepted boundaries are frequently regarded as more favorable by teachers, parents, and professors. In contrast, highly capable students who question or challenge these boundaries may be perceived as disruptive or unmanageable, despite their abilities.

​

Personal Experience of Ostracism

My own journey has not been marked by neglect due to incompetence, but rather by difficulty in being managed according to existing standards. This unmanageability has led to ostracism within my family. Statements from relatives have made it clear that no one should associate with me, and rumors have been spread to reinforce the boundaries and constraints of the family "box." These efforts serve to ensure that the limits remain intact and that conformity is maintained.

​

Mechanisms of Family Indoctrination

From what I have observed and experienced, family members actively instruct others not to engage with the members who has been ostracized. If a relative defies these instructions and contacts the excluded individual, they risk being banned from the family themselves. This approach is designed to make family members more manageable by enforcing strict adherence to group norms.

​

The Desire to Belong or the Choice to Chart One’s Own Path

The ongoing tension between the need for belonging and the urge for individual autonomy raises profound questions about the root causes of violence, self-destruction, and cult-like group behaviors. At the heart of this dilemma lies the fundamental human desire to be accepted and included, which can sometimes conflict with the pursuit of authenticity and self-realization. Individuals are often faced with a difficult choice: to conform and maintain approval within their families or communities, or to step outside these boundaries and define themselves on their own terms.

​

This struggle is not merely philosophical but carries real emotional consequences. The pressure to fit into established boxes, whether dictated by family, society, or cultural expectations, can lead to the gradual erosion of one’s spirit, sense of purpose, and even the will to live. The act of suppressing one’s true identity for the sake of acceptance may contribute to emotional suffering, psychological distress, or, in extreme cases, violent outbursts, self-harm, or suicidal ideation. These outcomes may be rooted in the internal conflict that arises when individuals attempt to reconcile their authentic selves with the labels and roles imposed by others.

 

Navigating the Path Between Belonging and Self-Determination.

​The recurring pattern of choosing between belonging and self-determination is more than an individual journey—it mirrors larger social dynamics. For many, the act of challenging imposed labels and stepping outside the boundaries of the “family box” becomes central to achieving self-realization. However, this pursuit often comes with the risk of social isolation or ostracism, highlighting how conformity and nonconformity deeply affect both personal well-being and the collective fabric of society.

​

The Emotional Cost and the Search for Peace

From personal experience, true peace is found when one chooses to distance themselves from family and familiar structures. This peace emerges in the silence, where one can finally hear their own thoughts. Initially, these thoughts are clouded by the lingering voices of family, community, and culture. Gradually, music becomes a part of this internal dialogue, prompting deeper reflection on its lyrics and the underlying questions they pose.

​

Discovery and Self-Transformation

The process continues as one deliberately selects genres of music, books, and teachings, motivated by a genuine willingness to learn—not to change the external world, but to transform the internal one. This marks the beginning of discovering one’s authentic self and purpose in the world. As this inner journey unfolds, thoughts of suicide, violence, or their potential diminish. The individual starts to weigh their actions and contemplate consequences, leading to a reassessment of relationships and the degree of closeness desired with others. Ultimately, the value of inner peace becomes paramount, guiding decisions and shaping connections.

​

The Bonsai Box: A Metaphor for Societal Grooming

The Bonsai Box stands as a vivid metaphor for the psychological grooming so often found within society. Just as a bonsai tree, which possesses the innate genetic potential to become a towering giant, is kept small and contained by a shallow pot and continual pruning, so too can human beings find themselves restricted. When individuals either actively participate in or passively allow this process—whether through personal choices or by submitting to outside influences, the result is a life characterized by limitation and suffocation.

​

The Tragedy of Constrained Roots

These dynamics illustrate some of the most profound tragedies of modern society. The roots of many individuals are made too small to support the spirit that wants to grow within them. The constant pressure created by these constraints can eventually erupt outward as acts of violence or turn inward, resulting in despair or outright defiance against another culture or religion because of living standards from which they live by, and the others see it and attack the mirror that is shown, instead of saying what can I learn and implement in myself or my family, eventually it can and or does lead to emotional collapse.

​

At the core of this tragedy is the reality that when individuals are continually pressured to fit into predetermined molds, their natural growth is stunted. The spirit within each person, seeking expansion and fulfillment, becomes confined by these invisible boundaries. Over time, the accumulation of this internal tension may manifest in harmful ways—some may respond with outward aggression, while others experience deep sadness, hopelessness, or a sense of alienation. Furthermore, these pressures can result in people rejecting, or even lashing out against, other cultures or belief systems. Instead of seeing differences as opportunities for self-reflection and learning, individuals may react defensively, attacking others rather than considering what positive changes they might adopt for themselves or their families. Ultimately, this cycle can culminate in emotional collapse, underscoring the devastating impact that societal constraints can have on the human spirit.

​

Breaking Out of the Box: Sovereignty and Self-Realization

This research and website are dedicated to exploring the limitations that society places on individuals and investigating the process required to break free from these constraints. At the heart of this inquiry lies the question: Can individuals discover their own sovereignty and self-realization independently, or does fear prevent them from doing so? This fear may manifest in different ways, such as the anxiety experienced by Adam, or through beliefs that attribute temptation and downfall to what most people think is the Devil’s influence, leading to statements about being condemned to Hell or accused of wrongdoing.

​

Personal Encounters with Heaven and Hell

Drawing from personal experience, I have encountered both Heaven and Hell. During a car accident, I felt myself leaving my body. I witnessed fiery flames encircling the earth as I ascended, eventually entering a dark place among the constellations. In this space, there were no physical bodies, only spirits and faint, misty shapes of people. Among them, George Washington appeared on his favorite horse, simply sitting, while others stood quietly. Then, I heard a voice instructing me to return, saying it was not yet my time. Observing that these spirits did little but stood around, I decided that if I could do the same on earth, I would seize the opportunity to create something meaningful with my life. I awoke to a sharp tone in my ear.

​

A Visit to Hell: Lessons from the Threshold

On a second occasion, after losing a kidney to sepsis and being airlifted in critical condition, I experienced a visit to Hell. Entering a bright room, I saw a red carpet and ropes, reminiscent of a walk of fame, and windows with neon lights but empty interiors. The only figure present was a man covered with straight hair who waved me through without looking up. When I inquired about the absence of others, he explained, “We’re not taking anybody here, and they definitely aren’t taking anybody up there, either!” He described how people on earth blame him for their problems, when in reality, everyone has the choice to take the good or the bad road. His role, he said, was to enforce the rules of dominion on earth, not to trap people. Those who manipulate others for personal gain are as culpable as the violent ones. The rules of Dominion are written by both God and himself, and together, Darkness and Light coexist.

​

The Pathway to Liberation: Cultivating Personal Sovereignty

Achieving liberation requires an intentional commitment to cultivating one’s own life. Rather than placing blame on external forces such as God or the Devil, individuals must embrace the principle of creative action—this action does not mean breaking the law or physically taking from someone else, but the ability to bring something new into existence from nothing. This gift is universal, accessible to all, and serves as a pathway that transcends cultural divides. The focus is not on constructing narratives or storyboards for marketing purposes, but on advocating for the importance of personal sovereignty. It is an invitation to explore what it means to be unmanageable by those commonly regarded as the “1%,” or what we think or hold to those perceived thoughts as to hold dominant power. The journey is about moving beyond the constraints of the Bonsai Box and stepping into the wild, untamed possibilities that lie beyond.

​

Understanding Branding: The Creation of Authentic Lifestyles

When an individual deeply understands the essence of a brand, it naturally attracts greater support from others. The act of creating from nothingness is fundamentally about building a lifestyle that is genuinely one’s own. This process is guided by inquiry and shaped by the experiences of those who have lived within the confines of the box but eventually outgrow these limitations. These individuals become seekers, pursuing their own unique direction in life.

​

Brands as Catalysts: Illuminating Boundaries and Enduring Legacy

Brands that possess the courage to expose and illuminate the boundaries of others’ cages take on a considerable burden. Yet, it is this willingness to confront and challenge limitations that enables such brands to endure through history. Their legacy is rooted in authenticity and a persistent drive to push against established norms.

​

The Paradox of Liberation: Un-Pruning the Roots

There is a profound paradox within the human condition: the same key that is intended to unlock freedom can also be misused to construct new forms of confinement. This is evident in the manipulation of faith, where spiritual tools, originally meant to foster growth, are instead wielded as instruments of control, gossip, and the establishment of social hierarchies. The Bonsai Box metaphor aptly illustrates how mechanisms designed for liberation are repurposed to reinforce limitations, trapping individuals in cycles of constraint.

​

The Two Types of 1%: Bound and Sovereign

Within society, there are two distinct types of the “1%.” The first, the bound 1%, maintain their dominance through the accumulation of material wealth, acts of gatekeeping, and by enforcing restrictive boundaries. Although they appear to be at the top, they remain bound by the very systems they have helped to create. In contrast, the sovereign 1% draw upon a creative or divine spark to liberate themselves, understanding that physical achievements are secondary to the freedom found within. These individuals do not seek validation from the box; rather, their liberty is rooted in the independence of their minds. This is the essence of true liberation.

If the broader world were to recognize and embrace the “True Self” path, it would likely resist, as the concept of free will carries an inherent sense of fear. Accepting that one possesses the power to save oneself also means taking on full responsibility for one’s choices and destiny. The question then arises: who among us is willing to step outside their comfort zone to become their authentic self?

It is far easier for the collective to remain in the safety of the bonsai box and attribute their limitations to external “pruners”—be it society, family, employers, or government—rather than to step out and realize the infinite possibilities of the broader garden. Experience suggests that the misuse of spiritual teachings and the transformation of prayer and scripture into tools for social control is a classic example of institutional capture. As narratives, such as religion, become boxes, they are appropriated to justify one’s darker impulses, resulting in a change of language but not of the heart. Gossip is disguised as “prayer requests,” and the impulse to control is reframed as “divine order.”

​

The Sovereign Creation: Walking Beyond Permission

Sovereign creation means being an independent visionary without waiting for the 1% to give permission. The grand opening of the gate is to walk through it and begin anew, again and again if necessary. Adam’s realization of his nakedness was the first moment of self-awareness—recognizing himself as a sovereign being responsible for his own life. He was not just “out of the box,” he understood the box existed and stepped through it.

​

Freedom feels like nakedness—when you don’t have a “box” (a religion that tells you how to pray, a job that tells you when to work, or a professor who tells you what is “A” work), you are naked before the universe.

​

Human Freedom: The Intangibles of Branding

The story of Cain and Abel represents two ways humans react to freedom: one creates, offering from the heart, and one destroys out of resentment of being “unboxed.” The sovereign and unboxed brand is the only type that achieves long-term success—these “intangibles” are infinite.

​

The Nothingness Principle describes how most brands start with a market gap, trying to do what others do 10% better—this is something from something. Those who start with nothingness ask, “What is the truth I am compelled to tell?” and have no competition, because there is only one of them. Most people are starved for authenticity, which doesn’t try to look perfect like the curated garden but strives to be real like the wilderness outside the gates of Bonsai Boxes. However, group thinking rejects authenticity, creating new boxes. To stay successful, a brand must constantly evolve: when people think they have captured it and put it in a box, it must move on and pivot. The intangible currency is insight and legacy; the Bonsai Box’s currency—money or status—is the visible, physical kind.

​

The Conclusion of the Manifesto: Beyond the Bonsai Box

​

I. The Gift of the Void

We are taught that creating from nothingness is a divine act reserved for the heavens. We believe it is the primary gift of the human being. To stand before the "Nothingness"—the burned records, the lost histories, and the empty canvas—and choose to pull a narrative into existence is the ultimate use of Free Will.

​

II. The Myth of the Fall

We do not view the exit from the Garden as a tragedy, but as a graduation. To realize one is "naked" is to realize one is no longer a curated ornament in someone else’s cage. Freedom is vulnerable. It is frightening. But it is the only state in which a "True Brand" can be born.

​

III. The Two Percentages

There are those who own the world’s material, and there are those who own their own minds.

The Bound 1%: High-status prisoners of the boxes they maintain or what we think they maintain.

The Sovereign 1%: Those who recognize that the physical is merely a shadow cast by the intangible. We do not seek the "A" from the professor or the "Like" from the collective. We seek the truth of the How and the Why.

​

IV. Resistance as Validation

When the "Box-Dwellers" ignore, boycott, or try to categorize you, they confirm your independence. A brand that fits into a box is a brand that can be controlled. We choose to be unmanageable. We choose to be unboxed.

​

The Real or Reality of Conclusion: The Power of Free Will

Free Will is the Exit: The "Fall" was actually the first act of Free Will. Adam and Eve weren't "kicked out"; they were "graduated" into the vulnerability of creation.

​

Nakedness is Power: To be "un-boxed" is to be vulnerable, but it is also to be the only person in the room who isn't wearing a "uniform."

The 1% of the Mind: Success isn't about dominating others; it's about dominating your own fear of the "Nothingness" until you can pull "Something" out of it.

​

The "Secret Boycott" is Proof: If the "Box-Dwellers" are ignoring you, it’s because you are reminding them that they are naked too, but they haven't realized they have the Free Will to leave the Garden.